[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1282147034.77481.33.camel@useless.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:57:14 -0400
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Chris Webb <chris@...chsys.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Over-eager swapping
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 23:21 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Andi, Christoph and Lee:
>
> This looks like an "unbalanced NUMA memory usage leading to premature
> swapping" problem.
What is the value of the vm.zone_reclaim_mode sysctl? If it is !0, the
system will go into zone reclaim before allocating off-node pages.
However, it shouldn't "swap" in this case unless (zone_reclaim_mode & 4)
!= 0. And even then, zone reclaim should only reclaim file pages, not
anon. In theory...
Note: zone_reclaim_mode will be enabled by default [= 1] if the SLIT
contains any distances > 2.0 [20]. Check SLIT values via 'numactl
--hardware'.
Lee
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:46:59PM +0800, Chris Webb wrote:
> > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> writes:
> >
> > > Did you enable any NUMA policy? That could start swapping even if
> > > there are lots of free pages in some nodes.
> >
> > Hi. Thanks for the follow-up. We haven't done any configuration or tuning of
> > NUMA behaviour, but NUMA support is definitely compiled into the kernel:
> >
> > # zgrep NUMA /proc/config.gz
> > CONFIG_NUMA_IRQ_DESC=y
> > CONFIG_NUMA=y
> > CONFIG_K8_NUMA=y
> > CONFIG_X86_64_ACPI_NUMA=y
> > # CONFIG_NUMA_EMU is not set
> > CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA=y
> > # grep -i numa /var/log/dmesg.boot
> > NUMe: Allocated memnodemap from b000 - 1b540
> > NUMA: Using 20 for the hash shift.
> >
> > > Are your free pages equally distributed over the nodes? Or limited to
> > > some of the nodes? Try this command:
> > >
> > > grep MemFree /sys/devices/system/node/node*/meminfo
> >
> > My worst-case machines current have swap completely turned off to make them
> > usable for clients, but I have one machine which is about 3GB into swap with
> > 8GB of buffers and 3GB free. This shows
> >
> > # grep MemFree /sys/devices/system/node/node*/meminfo
> > /sys/devices/system/node/node0/meminfo:Node 0 MemFree: 954500 kB
> > /sys/devices/system/node/node1/meminfo:Node 1 MemFree: 2374528 kB
> >
> > I could definitely imagine that one of the nodes could have dipped down to
> > zero in the past. I'll try enabling swap on one of our machines with the bad
> > problem late tonight and repeat the experiment. The node meminfo on this box
> > currently looks like
> >
> > # grep MemFree /sys/devices/system/node/node*/meminfo
> > /sys/devices/system/node/node0/meminfo:Node 0 MemFree: 82732 kB
> > /sys/devices/system/node/node1/meminfo:Node 1 MemFree: 1723896 kB
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Chris.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists