[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100818192508.GC6567@basil.fritz.box>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:25:08 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Patrick J. LoPresti" <lopresti@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Use hi-res clock for file timestamps
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:54:56PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:50:40PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > - nfsd updates it whenever it reads an mtime out of an inode that matches
> > > current_fs_time to the granularity of 1/HZ.
> >
> > That means you have a very very hot cache line on a larger system
> > if there are a lot of mtime changes. Probably a bad idea.
>
> Only if those mtime changes are also followed immediately by nfsd reads
> of the mtime.
If multiple writers are changing the same location in quick succession
you have a hot cache line that gets bounced around. It doesn't need reads,
although reads make it even worse.
There's a lot of effort currently to make the VFS more parallel
and less synchronized and it would be bad again to regress here again.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists