linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/1] mutex: prevent optimistic spinning from spinning longer than neccessary (Repost)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1282168827.9542.72.camel@schen9-DESK>
Date:	Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:00:27 -0700
From:	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH  1/1] mutex: prevent optimistic spinning from spinning
 longer than neccessary (Repost)

I didn't get any feedback on this post sent a while back.  So I'm
reposting it to see if I can get some comments back this time.

There is a scalability issue for current implementation of optimistic
mutex spin in the kernel.  It is found on a 8 node 64 core Nehalem-EX
system (HT mode).

The intention of the optimistic mutex spin is to busy wait and spin on a 
mutex if the owner of the mutex is running, in the hope that the mutex 
will be released soon and be acquired, without the thread
trying to acquire mutex going to sleep.  However, 
when we have a large number of threads, contending for the mutex, we could 
have the mutex grabbed by other thread, and then another ……, and we will keep 
spinning, wasting cpu cycles and adding to the contention.  One
possible fix is to quit spinning and put the current thread on wait-list
if mutex lock switch to a new owner while we spin, indicating heavy
contention (see the patch included).   

I did some testing on a 8 socket Nehalem-EX system with a total of 64
cores. Using Ingo's test-mutex program that creates/delete files with
256 threads (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/8/50) , I see the following
speed up after putting in the mutex spin fix:

./mutex-test V 256 10
                Ops/sec
2.6.34          62864
With fix        197200

Repeating the test with Aim7 fserver workload, again there is a speed up
with the fix:

                Jobs/min
2.6.34          91657
With fix        149325

To look at the impact on the distribution of mutex acquisition time, I
collected the mutex acquisition time on Aim7 fserver workload with some
instrumentation.  The average acquisition time is reduced by 48% and
number of contentions reduced by 32%.

                #contentions    Time to acquire mutex (cycles)
2.6.34          72973           44765791
With fix        49210           23067129 

The histogram of mutex acquisition time is listed below.  The
acquisition time is in 2^bin cycles.  We see that without the fix, the
acquisition time is mostly around 2^26 cycles.  With the fix, we the
distribution get spread out a lot more towards the lower cycles,
starting from 2^13.  However, there is an increase of the tail
distribution with the fix at 2^28 and 2^29 cycles.  It seems a
small price to pay for the reduced average acquisition time and also
getting the cpu to do useful work.

Mutex acquisition time distribution (acq time = 2^bin cycles):
        2.6.34                  With Fix
bin     #occurrence     %       #occurrence     %
11      2               0.00%   120             0.24%
12      10              0.01%   790             1.61%
13      14              0.02%   2058            4.18%
14      86              0.12%   3378            6.86%
15      393             0.54%   4831            9.82%
16      710             0.97%   4893            9.94%
17      815             1.12%   4667            9.48%
18      790             1.08%   5147            10.46%
19      580             0.80%   6250            12.70%
20      429             0.59%   6870            13.96%
21      311             0.43%   1809            3.68%
22      255             0.35%   2305            4.68%
23      317             0.44%   916             1.86%
24      610             0.84%   233             0.47%
25      3128            4.29%   95              0.19%
26      63902           87.69%  122             0.25%
27      619             0.85%   286             0.58%
28      0               0.00%   3536            7.19%
29      0               0.00%   903             1.83%
30      0               0.00%   0               0.00%

Regards,
Tim

Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
diff -ur linux-2.6.34/kernel/sched.c linux-2.6.34-fix/kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.6.34/kernel/sched.c 2010-05-16 14:17:36.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.34-fix/kernel/sched.c     2010-06-04 10:28:33.564777030 -0700
@@ -3815,8 +3815,11 @@
                /*
                 * Owner changed, break to re-assess state.
                 */
-               if (lock->owner != owner)
+               if (lock->owner != owner) {
+                       if (lock->owner)
+                               return 0;
                        break;
+               }

                /*
                 * Is that owner really running on that cpu?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/