lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1282177950.2744.1587.camel@yhuang-dev>
Date:	Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:32:30 +0800
From:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: number of elements or bytes for kfifo_in etc

Hi, Stefani,

On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 00:35 +0800, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 18.08.2010, 13:29 +0800 schrieb Huang Ying:
> > Hi, Stefani,
> > 
> > In new kfifo implementation in 2.6.36-rc1, description of the third
> > parameter is:
> > 
> > "@n: number of elements to be added"
> > 
> > But if my understanding is correct, the actual implementation is:
> > 
> > "@n: number of bytes to be added"
> > 
> 
> Number of bytes is wrong, this is only valid for byte stream fifo's
> where an element is a byte.
> 
> Have a look at samples/kfifo/inttype-example.c where an element is a int
> type.

Yes. You are right. I misunderstood your code. Sorry for bothering.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ