[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100819083612.GA13293@shutemov.name>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:36:12 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <virtuoso@...nd.org>, lkml@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@...com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFCv2] notify userspace about time changes
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 09:09:37PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:53:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Is sysfs the right interface for this thing? Bear in mind that
> > CONFIG_SYSFS does exist.
> >
> > > + fd = open("/sys/kernel/time_notify", O_WRONLY);
> > > + fdprintf(fd, "%d 1 0 1 1", efd);
> >
> > why not
> >
> > sys_time_notify(efd, 1, 0, 1, 1);
>
> Yeah, that would be much better than a sysfs file, this is abusing the
> sysfs interface quite a lot.
Do you really think, that increasing number of syscalls is better then
fs-based interfaces?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists