linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] perf_events: NMI watchdog event cannot be throttled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:05:16 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	eranian@...il.com, perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf_events: NMI watchdog event cannot be throttled

On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 22:26 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I ran into some issue  with the NMI watchdog not firing in a deadlock
> situation. After some debugging I found the source of the problem.
> 
> The NMI watchdog is currently subject, like any other events, to interrupt
> throttling. The heart of the problem is that if you are deadlocked on a CPU
> with interrupts masked, the timer interrupt won't fire, therefore the
> hwc->interrupts
> field won't be reset. Then, depending on the max sampling rate, you
> could eventually
> fail the max interrupt rate test in __pfm_overflow_handler() and
> perf_events would
> throttle, i.e., stop, the NMI watchdog event before the 5s delay to panic.
> Thus, you would never get the panic. I ran into this problem myself.
> 
> This is a serious issue because perf_events must ensure the watchdog can
> always fire, regardless of the interrupt masking situation.
> 
> Look like one way of solving the problem would be to mark the NMI watchdog
> event as immune to throttling. The event being internal to the kernel we could
> trust the event setup from perf_event_create_kernel_counter().

Something like so?

---
 kernel/watchdog.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 613bc1f..e0fe6e4 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -206,6 +206,9 @@ void watchdog_overflow_callback(struct perf_event *event, int nmi,
 		 struct perf_sample_data *data,
 		 struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+	/* Ensure the watchdog never gets throttled. */
+	event->hw.interrupts = 0;
+
 	if (__get_cpu_var(watchdog_nmi_touch) == true) {
 		__get_cpu_var(watchdog_nmi_touch) = false;
 		return;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/