linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce ptr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100819124017.GI12892@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Thu, 19 Aug 2010 06:40:17 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] introduce ptr_diff()

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:23:09PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> IMHO it would be better to simply disable the warning in sparse instead
> of uglying the code just to work around sparse bogosity. It doesnt' seem
> to make much sense. A subtraction followed by a shift is not expensive.

What makes you think it's a shift?  struct page isn't necessarily a
power of two in size.  The original poster said "allyesconfig" which is
going to add in KMEMCHECK and WANT_PAGE_DEBUG_FLAGS.  I think that makes
it 76 bytes on x86-32, so sparse is right to warn.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/