[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100819083028.6509ab3e.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 08:30:28 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel-doc problem
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:20:19 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote:
> Randy, all,
>
> I'm running into a problem where something that I want to be part of a
> description of a struct member or function parameter gets parsed as a
> new section. You can easily see the problem by running below test file
> through kernel-doc, clearly the intent is not to have a new section in
> the middle of function argument descriptions, but I have no idea how I
> could fix this.
>
> I'd appreciate if you could take a look.
>
> Thanks,
> Johannes
>
> --- here's the file ---
> /**
> * fn - test
> *
> * @a: This is just a non-sense and totally useless dummy function
> * argument: it has absolutely no effect.
> */
> void fn(int a)
> {
> }
Colons (':') are bad. They cause a section instance.
I don't know how to fix it (inside kernel-doc or docproc or xmlto or wherever).
Sometimes I change colon to "--" or "." or something that makes some sense,
but colon is still the better choice if it would work.
The word "example" has a similar problem. It causes an <informalexample>
markup to begin, but it's not always terminated properly.
See recent commit 3d2be54bab7efd97b642838b9c883869ca5b98be.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists