[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100819015752.GB5762@localhost>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:57:52 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] hugetlb: add corrupted hugepage counter
> +void increment_corrupted_huge_page(struct page *page);
> +void decrement_corrupted_huge_page(struct page *page);
nitpick: increment/decrement are not verbs.
> +void increment_corrupted_huge_page(struct page *hpage)
> +{
> + struct hstate *h = page_hstate(hpage);
> + spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> + h->corrupted_huge_pages++;
> + spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +}
> +
> +void decrement_corrupted_huge_page(struct page *hpage)
> +{
> + struct hstate *h = page_hstate(hpage);
> + spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> + BUG_ON(!h->corrupted_huge_pages);
There is no point to have BUG_ON() here:
/*
* Don't use BUG() or BUG_ON() unless there's really no way out; one
* example might be detecting data structure corruption in the middle
* of an operation that can't be backed out of. If the (sub)system
* can somehow continue operating, perhaps with reduced functionality,
* it's probably not BUG-worthy.
*
* If you're tempted to BUG(), think again: is completely giving up
* really the *only* solution? There are usually better options, where
* users don't need to reboot ASAP and can mostly shut down cleanly.
*/
And there is a race case that (corrupted_huge_pages==0)!
Suppose the user space calls unpoison_memory() on a good pfn, and the page
happen to be hwpoisoned between lock_page() and TestClearPageHWPoison(),
corrupted_huge_pages will go negative.
Thanks,
Fengguang
> + h->corrupted_huge_pages--;
> + spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists