[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1282184643-29860-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:24:00 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...ts.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Fixing udelay() on SMP (and non-SMP too)
These patches are another attempt at fixing the udelay()
issue pointed out on arm-lkml[1][2]. A quick recap: some SMP
machines can scale their CPU frequencies independent of one
another. loops_per_jiffy is calibrated globally and used in
__const_udelay(). If one CPU is running faster than what the
loops_per_jiffy is calculated (or scaled) for, udelay() will
be incorrect and not wait long enough (or too long). A similar
problem occurs if the cpu frequency is scaled during a udelay()
call.
We could fix this issue a couple ways, wholesale replacement
of __udelay() and __const_udelay() (see [2] for that approach),
or replacement of __delay() (this series). Option 1 can fail if
anybody uses udelay() before memory is mapped and also duplicates
most of the code in asm/delay.h. It also needs to hardcode the
timer tick frequency, which can sometimes be inaccurate. The
benefit is that loops_per_jiffy stays the same and thus BogoMIPS
is unchanged. Option 2 can't fail since the __delay() loop is
replaced after memory is mapped in, but it suffers from a low
BogoMIPS when timers are clocked slowly. It also more accurately
calculates the timer tick frequency through the use of
calibrate_delay_direct().
-- Reference --
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/977567
[2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/78496
Stephen Boyd (3):
[ARM] Translate delay.S into (mostly) C
[ARM] Allow machines to override __delay()
[ARM] Implement a timer based __delay() loop
arch/arm/include/asm/delay.h | 5 ++-
arch/arm/kernel/armksyms.c | 4 --
arch/arm/lib/delay.S | 65 ------------------------------
arch/arm/lib/delay.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/arm/lib/delay.S
create mode 100644 arch/arm/lib/delay.c
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists