[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C6DB62C.9040105@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:54:36 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
CC: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86@...nel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stable Maintainers <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] numa:x86_64: Cacheline aliasing makes for_each_populated_zone
extremely expensive -V2.
On 08/18/2010 11:30 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
>
> - node_data[nodeid] = early_node_mem(nodeid, start, end, pgdat_size,
> + /*
> + * Allocate an extra cacheline per node to reduce cacheline
> + * aliasing when scanning all node's node_data.
> + */
> + cache_alias_offset = nodeid * SMP_CACHE_BYTES;
> + node_data[nodeid] = cache_alias_offset +
> + early_node_mem(nodeid, start, end,
> + pgdat_size + cache_alias_offset,
> SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> - if (node_data[nodeid] == NULL)
> + if (node_data[nodeid] == (void *)cache_alias_offset)
> return;
> nodedata_phys = __pa(node_data[nodeid]);
> reserve_early(nodedata_phys, nodedata_phys + pgdat_size, "NODE_DATA");
I'm concerned about this, because it really seems to rely on subtleties
in the behavior of early_node_mem, as well as the direction of
find_e820_area -- which is pretty much intended to change anyway. It's
the "action at a distance" effect.
What we really want, I think, is to push the offsetting into
find_early_area(). Right now we have an alignment parameter, but what
we need is an alignment and a color parameter (this is just a classic
case of cache coloring, after all) which indicates the desirable offset
from the alignment base.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists