[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100819164354.09e30dc9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:43:54 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, michal.simek@...alogix.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...glemail.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial: 8250: Initialize pointer to irq_info
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:17:20 +0100
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:59:06 +0200
> Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu> wrote:
>
> > Initialize "i" irq_info pointer in serial_unlink_irq_chain.
> >
> > Compilation warning:
> > CC drivers/serial/8250.o
> > drivers/serial/8250.c: In function 'serial8250_shutdown':
> > drivers/serial/8250.c:1701: warning: 'i' may be used uninitialized in
> > this function
>
> NAK (again)
>
> Use a newer compiler - modern ones get this right.
: static void serial_unlink_irq_chain(struct uart_8250_port *up)
: {
: struct irq_info *i;
: struct hlist_node *n;
: struct hlist_head *h;
:
: mutex_lock(&hash_mutex);
:
: h = &irq_lists[up->port.irq % NR_IRQ_HASH];
:
: hlist_for_each(n, h) {
: i = hlist_entry(n, struct irq_info, node);
: if (i->irq == up->port.irq)
: break;
: }
:
: BUG_ON(n == NULL);
: BUG_ON(i->head == NULL);
How can any compiler possibly determine that the hlist_for_each() is
never executed zero times?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists