[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1282177213.7801.17.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:20:13 -0700
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"chris@...stnet.net" <chris@...stnet.net>,
"debian00@...ceadsl.fr" <debian00@...ceadsl.fr>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"jonathan.protzenko@...il.com" <jonathan.protzenko@...il.com>,
"mans@...sr.com" <mans@...sr.com>,
"psastudio@...l.ru" <psastudio@...l.ru>,
"rjw@...k.pl" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"stephan.eicher@....de" <stephan.eicher@....de>,
"sxxe@....de" <sxxe@....de>,
"thomas@...hlinux.org" <thomas@...hlinux.org>,
"venki@...gle.com" <venki@...gle.com>,
"wonghow@...il.com" <wonghow@...il.com>,
"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>, tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] sched: init rt_avg stat whenever rq comes online
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 01:51 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 21:25 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > You can use something like:
> >
> > suspend:
> > __get_cpu_var(cyc2ns_suspend) = sched_clock();
> >
> > resume:
> > for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> > per_cpu(cyc2ns_offset, i) += per_cpu(cyc2ns_suspend);
> >
> > or something like that to keep sched_clock() stable, which is exactly
> > what most (all?) its users expect when we report the TSC is usable.
>
> That's actually broken, you only want a single offset, otherwise we
> de-sync the TSC, which is bad.
>
> So simply store the sched_clock() value at suspend time on the single
> CPU that is still running, then on resume make sure sched_clock()
> continues there by adding that stamp to all CPU offsets.
Peter, That might not be enough. I should add that in my Lenovo T410
(having 2 core wsm cpu), TSC's are somehow set to a strange big value
(for example 0xfffffffebc22f02e) after resume from S3. It looks like
bios might be writing TSC during resume. I am not sure if this is the
case for other OEM laptops aswell. I am checking.
So such large values of TSC (leading to a very big difference between
rq->clock and rq->age_stamp) wont be correctly handled by
scale_rt_power() either.
thanks,
suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists