[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100820161631A.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:17:48 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: mitov@...p.bas.bg
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] add
dma_reserve_coherent_memory()/dma_free_reserved_memory() API
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:18:35 +0300
Marin Mitov <mitov@...p.bas.bg> wrote:
> struct device contains a member: struct dma_coherent_mem *dma_mem;
> to hold information for a piece of memory declared dma-coherent.
> Alternatively the same member could also be used to hold preallocated
> dma-coherent memory for latter per-device use.
I think that drivers/base/dma-coherent.c is for architectures to
implement dma_alloc_coherent(). So using it for drivers doesn't look
correct.
> This tric is already used in drivers/staging/dt3155v4l.c
> dt3155_alloc_coherent()/dt3155_free_coherent()
>
> Here proposed for general use by popular demand from video4linux folks.
> Helps for videobuf-dma-contig framework.
What you guys exactly want to do? If you just want to pre-allocate
coherent memory for latter usage, why dma_pool API (mm/dmapool.c)
doesn't work?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists