[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100820091645.GA20138@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:16:45 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: callchain sampling bug in perf?
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:04:22PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> [acme@...pio tmp]$ perf report
>
> http://vger.kernel.org/~acme/perf/perf-report-tui-callchain-xlog_sync.png
>
> So it seems to work (you tell me if the callchains make sense), and the problem
I've rebuilt perf with libnewt to reproduce it, but to get any of the
callchain data I need to call perf report with a -g argument (which is
rather expected from the documentation anyway)
I still see the same problems as with the TUI perf report with that.
With the -g {mode},0.0 there is nothing to expand inside the GUI for
e.g. the pythong process, and with the 0.0 threshold I can only expand
a few 0.<something> callchains, but I never see the 80% your screenshot
shows. What perf version are you running?
Also the flat mode is rendered incorrectly, it just adds different call
graphs inside a single process directly after each other instead of
separating them in the rendering.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists