[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100820092127.GC20138@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:21:27 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Michael Kerrisk <michael.kerrisk@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] notification tree: directory events
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:19:07PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> What about unifying the file identification here with the file handle used for open_by_handle()? That keeps a consistent identifier for the inode between multiple system calls (always a good thing), and allows the inode to be opened again via open_by_handle() if needed.
That's what the dmapi callouts that are intendeded to do just about the
same as fanotify always did. I'm pretty sure I brought this up earlier
in the discussion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists