lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=tVieTnz1R=9Jh45LweUwJ=mtszM1U9XAEVrK7@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:14:38 +0800
From:	xiaoyu Du <tingsrain@...il.com>
To:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ja@....bg,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [patch nf-next] IPVS: ICMPv6 checksum calculation

I just replied to thank for his idea then, as he gived me some ideas
on how to manipulate
checksum. I tested the code today, but it doesn't seem to work. (I just wrote a
netfilter module and hooked the code on local_out , then ping6 the
address on another PC,
It failed.). I'll find out why.

2010/8/18 Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:20:14PM +0800, xiaoyu Du wrote:
>> 2010/8/18 David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
>> > From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
>> > Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:21:49 +0900
>> >
>> >> [ CCing netdev for comment ]
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>> >  ...
>> >>>      May be ip_vs_checksum_complete() is not needed here?
>> >>> Also, skb->csum is not valid for every ip_summed value.
>> >>> May be we need to apply CHECKSUM_PARTIAL kind of setup for the IPv6.
>> >>> Such example is net/ipv6/udp.c:udp6_ufo_send_check().
>> >>> Later dev_queue_xmit() and skb_checksum_help() should take care
>> >>> for the next steps. Something like this can be tested:
>> >>>
>> >>>      icmph->icmp6_cksum = csum_ipv6_magic(&iph->saddr,
>> >>>              &iph->daddr,
>> >>>              skb->len - icmp_offset, IPPROTO_ICMPV6,
>> >>>              0);
>> >>>      skb->csum_start = skb_network_header(skb) - skb->head +
>> >>>                        icmp_offset;
>> >>>      skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct icmp6hdr, icmp6_cksum);
>> >>>      skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
>> >>>
>> >
>> > Yes, using CHECKSUM_PARTIAL unconditionally would work.
>> >
>> Thanks, I learned this. You gave me a big cake.
>
> [ please don't top-post ]
>
> Xiaoyu, are you in a position to test the code proposed by Julian?
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ