[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100820120001.GR31363@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:00:02 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] initramfs: remove sparse warnings
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:38:23PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 19 August 2010, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > This patchset removes most of sparse warnings in init/initramfs.c.
> > Current implementation of initramfs relies on syscall service rountins heavily
> > so it requires many of arguments to be __user address space pointers but, in
> > most cases, were missing proper markups. This patchset tries to fix those at
> > a minimum change.
>
> I'm skeptical about this, you are adding obviously incorrect annotations
> to the code to make something work that was written without the awareness
> for address spaces.
>
> A better way would be to call path_lookup or kern_path to look up the
> path and pass that to a lower-level file I/O function.
No. This code should *NOT* use the VFS guts, TYVM. The whole fscking point
is that this puppy is a sequence of plain vanilla syscalls, ideally run
simply in userland thread. We used to have a magical mystery shite in there
and it had been a huge PITA.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists