[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinic7H0r7kAgsBiRAbn7MCeqxA0Gme7oOkmPUdJ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:36:44 +0800
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] netfilter: save the hash of the tuple in the original
direction for latter use
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Le vendredi 20 août 2010 à 23:22 +0800, Changli Gao a écrit :
>
>> I should keep the old way, but fix a race.
>>
>> if (unlikely(!nf_conntrack_hash_rnd_initted)) {
>> get_random_bytes(&nf_conntrack_hash_rnd,
>> sizeof(nf_conntrack_hash_rnd));
>> nf_conntrack_hash_rnd_initted = 1;
>> }
>>
>> nf_conntrack_alloc() isn't called with in the nf_conntrack_lock. So
>> the above code maybe executed more than once on different CPUs. It is
>> easy to fix with the cmpxchg() trick.
>
> Sure, please fix the race first.
>
> But as I said, its not critical, if one or two conntracks are hashed on
> wrong basis. They will eventually disappear after timeout.
>
Yes, and it isn't critical. I think this fix should be in a separate patch.
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists