[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1282323276.9675.6.camel@schen9-DESK>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:54:35 -0700
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
peterz@...radead.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mutex: prevent optimistic spinning from spinning
longer than neccessary (Repost)
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 15:19 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Thanks! The performance results you've posted so far IMO more than justifies
> its inclusion.
>
> Ingo
Thanks to everyone for your review. I've updated the patch to add
comments explaining the change per suggestion from Andrew.
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 41541d7..3747d04 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -3865,8 +3865,15 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct thread_info *owner)
/*
* Owner changed, break to re-assess state.
*/
- if (lock->owner != owner)
+ if (lock->owner != owner) {
+ /* if lock has switched to a different owner,
+ * we have heavy contention. Return 0 to
+ * quit optimistic spinning and not contend further.
+ */
+ if (lock->owner)
+ return 0;
break;
+ }
/*
* Is that owner really running on that cpu?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists