[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100820172824.GD2937@mothafucka.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:28:24 -0300
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
To: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KVM timekeeping 08/35] Warn about unstable TSC
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:07:22PM -1000, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> If creating an SMP guest with unstable host TSC, issue a warning
>
> Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>
Ok, I am not sure I agree 100 % this is needed.
I believe we should try to communicate this kind of thing to the guest,
not the host, and through cpuid.
Passing through tsc flags to the guest should maybe be enough?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists