[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinGnUaWJbrV7Jcy+Uiu682uE6_2eHr0T3km+ihf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:24:30 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [2/3] mm: fix up some user-visible effects of the stack guard page
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Appended is that much smaller patch.
Note that the "real" patch is actually even smaller than implied by
this thing. The diffstat
include/linux/mm_types.h | 2 +-
kernel/fork.c | 7 +++++--
mm/mmap.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
mm/nommu.c | 7 +++++--
4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
implies that it adds a lot more than it removes, but of the 35 new
lines it adds, about half of it - 16 lines - is just the vma list
verification hack. So it really adds less than 20 lines of code.
Hopefully those 20 lines would then buy themselves back with cleanups.
Still. A doubly-linked list is totally trivial, and I just bet I have
a bug in there somewhere. But looking at your 2007 patch and mine
side-by-side, I do think mine is still less scary.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists