linux-kernel - [RFC] mlock/stack guard interaction fixup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTimuP9cFvd4pfqy6=vixSMdagrSEv1-VLNAEuWgr@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:59:55 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	stable-review@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [RFC] mlock/stack guard interaction fixup

Ian (and others),
 here's a three-patch series that uses the doubly linked list to do
your mlock() case hopefully correctly.

NOTE! It's untested. The first patch (which is the slightly scary one)
is tested to some degree, the two other ones I checked that they
compile, but that's it.

I'm not going to apply them to my main tree unless they get testing
and acks. And as mentioned, I've not done any of the changes that
having a vm_prev pointer can allow in other places.

Comments? Fixes? Braindamage?

                               Linus

View attachment "0001-mm-make-the-vma-list-be-doubly-linked.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (4865 bytes)

View attachment "0002-mm-make-the-mlock-stack-guard-page-checks-stricter.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1667 bytes)

View attachment "0003-mm-make-stack-guard-page-logic-use-vm_prev-pointer.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1508 bytes)