[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100821160839.GA26375@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:08:39 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] mlock/stack guard interaction fixup
>
> > Out of interest, why is there no guard page for the VM_GROWSUP stack
> > case? Is it just that the memory layout on PA-RISC makes the stack grows
> > into the heap scenario impossible?
>
> No, it's just that I can't find it in myself to care about PA-RISC, so
> I never wrote the code. I don't think anything else has a grows-up
> stack. And even if I were to write the code, I couldn't even test it.
>
> It should be reasonably easy to do the VM_GROWSUP case too, but
> somebody with a PA-RISC would need to do it.
Tony Luck already provided a VM_GROWSUP version.
See: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/20/325
[It is signed off by Tony Luc - but I guess they know each other ;-) ]
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists