linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Add support for the Fintek F71808E

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C7166B6.1080505@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 22 Aug 2010 20:04:38 +0200
From:	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Giel van Schijndel <me@...tis.eu>,
	Laurens Leemans <laurens@...nips.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	lm-sensors@...sensors.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Add support for the Fintek F71808E

Hi,

On 08/18/2010 08:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:01:36 +0200
> Hans de Goede<hdegoede@...hat.com>  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 08/10/2010 09:11 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:36:22PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> On 08/01/2010 03:30 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>>>>> Allow device probing to recognise the Fintek F71808E.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sysfs interface:
>>>>>     * Fan/pwm control is the same as for F71889FG
>>>>
>>>> My datasheet strongly disagrees with this ...
>>>
>>> I just noticed this patch was applied to mainline anyway.  Regardless, I
>>> will (try to) address these issues you raised.
>>>
>>> Right now however, I am prioritising personal stuff above this
>>> driver---bachelor's thesis and graduation presentation.  When finished
>>> with that (september) I'll allocate time to these issues again.
>>>
>>
>> I've send a mail directly to akpm asking for this to be removed, hopefully
>> this will help.
>
> It seems that I managed to muck up my paperwork and the patch was
> merged into mainline.
>
> We can revert it, or we can fix it up in place in time for 2.6.36.
> What do you guys suggest?

Since both Giel and I are low on time to work on this, and since missing
hwmon support on a system is not really a big deal (for most users) I suggest
that this patch is reverted until we find the time to do it properly.

Regards,

Hans

p.s.

I've already seen mails that you've dropped this patch from -mm, does that
mean it thas been removed from mainly too ? If not please remove it from
mainline / ask Linus to remove it.

Thanks.

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/