[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100823085339.GA26713@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:53:39 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with running
perfctrs
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > I'll test tip later today to see if I can reproduce it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Don
> >
> > Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >it's not working so well, i'm getting:
> > >
> > > Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 00 on CPU 9.
> > > Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
> > > Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
> > >
> > >on a nehalem box, after a perf top and perf stat run.
>
> FYI, it does not trigger on an AMD box.
Ok, to not hold up the perf/urgent flow i zapped these two commits for
the time being:
4a31beb: perf, x86: Fix handle_irq return values
8e3e42b: perf, x86: Try to handle unknown nmis with an enabled PMU
We can apply them if they take a form that dont introduce a different
kind of (and more visible) regression.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists