linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] HWPOISON, hugetlb: move PG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100823092449.GC3769@spritzera.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Date:	Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:24:49 +0900
From:	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] HWPOISON, hugetlb: move PG_HWPoison bit check

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 05:28:28PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:55:43PM +0800, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:18:42AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:27:36PM +0800, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > > > In order to handle metadatum correctly, we should check whether the hugepage
> > > > we are going to access is HWPOISONed *before* incrementing mapcount,
> > > > adding the hugepage into pagecache or constructing anon_vma.
> > > > This patch also adds retry code when there is a race between
> > > > alloc_huge_page() and memory failure.
> > > 
> > > This duplicates the PageHWPoison() test into 3 places without really
> > > address any problem. For example, there are still _unavoidable_ races
> > > between PageHWPoison() and add_to_page_cache().
> > > 
> > > What's the problem you are trying to resolve here? If there are
> > > data structure corruption, we may need to do it in some other ways.
> > 
> > The problem I tried to resolve in this patch is the corruption of
> > data structures when memory failure occurs between alloc_huge_page()
> > and lock_page().
> > The corruption occurs because page fault can fail with metadata changes
> > remained (such as refcount, mapcount, etc.) 
> > Since the PageHWPoison() check is for avoiding hwpoisoned page remained
> > in pagecache mapping to the process, it should be done in
> > "found in pagecache" branch, not in the common path.
> > This patch moves the check to "found in pagecache" branch.
> 
> That's good stuff to put in the changelog.

OK.

> > In addition to that, I added 2 PageHWPoison checks in "new allocation" branches
> > to enhance the possiblity to recover from memory failures on pages under allocation.
> > But it's a different point from the original one, so I drop these retry checks.
> 
> So you'll remove the first two chunks and retain the 3rd chunk?

Yes.

> That makes it a small bug-fix patch suitable for 2.6.36 and I'll
> happily ACK it :)

Thank you!

Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/