linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET block#for-2.6.36-post] block: replace barrier with sequenced flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:48:15 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	jaxboe@...ionio.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
	James.Bottomley@...e.de, tytso@....edu, chris.mason@...cle.com,
	swhiteho@...hat.com, konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp,
	dm-devel@...hat.com, vst@...b.net, jack@...e.cz, hare@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET block#for-2.6.36-post] block: replace barrier with sequenced flush

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:30:33PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> It might be useful to give several example configurations with
> different cache configurations.  I don't have much experience with
> battery backed arrays but aren't they suppose to report write through
> cache automatically?

They usually do.  I have one that doesn't, but SYNCHRONIZE CACHE on
it is so fast that it effectively must be a no-op.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/