linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pio: add arch specific gpio_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <30193.50267.qm@web180305.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	bn@...sdigital.com, ryan@...ewatersys.com,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	avictor.za@...il.com, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pio: add arch specific gpio_is_valid() function



--- On Mon, 8/23/10, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> wrote:

> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] pio: add arch specific gpio_is_valid() function

What's the rationale?  It's valid or not.  And there's already a
function whose job it is to report that status ... which is set up
for arch customization.  Which ISTR worked fine for AT91 (among other
platforms) ...

So my first reacion is "NAK, pointless".

> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/