[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100823174620.GA12375@tux>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:46:20 -0700
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>
To: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>
CC: Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@...eros.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Kevin Hayes <kevin@...eros.com>,
David Quan <David.Quan@...eros.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"geoclue@...ts.freedesktop.org" <geoclue@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] iw: add GeoClue support
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:05:07AM -0700, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 08:44 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > What use is a command line tool that has to talk to a whole bunch of
> > > daemons etc.?
> >
> > The current implementation doesn't talk to deamons. The hostip
> > provider within GeoClue and it will just trigger a URL get. If
> > desktops start implementing a master server though then the query
> > would simply be a cached response.
>
> Note that this error carries on in the mail. There is a master provider
> for Geoclue that can make use of whatever providers are available, but
> it's not in too good a shape.
I see, can you elaborate on that a little?
> I'd rather somebody started fixing the Geoclue master provider rather
> than relying on a particular service, especially when the D-Bus API for
> the providers themselves is something we don't want to support in the
> longer term.
Would the master provider not use Dbus for gypsy, for example?
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists