linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/6] md: remove dependency on __GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008231339300.20535@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/6] md: remove dependency on __GFP_NOFAIL

On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> My point is that I don't think Andrew's helper will change all that
> much. Fixing the actual callers is the hard part and I don't see your
> patches helping that either. Hiding the looping in filesystem code is
> only going to make problematic callers harder to find (e.g
> kmem_alloc() in XFS code).
> 

Nothing is getting hidden in the callers here, all of the patches in this 
series are using __GFP_NOFAIL unnecessarily.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/