[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1282633129-9187-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:58:46 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
peterz@...radead.org, oleg@...hat.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] timer: patchset focus on del_timer_sync()
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@...driver.com>
This is inspired by http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/16/291
which catch a lockdep false positive on fake_timer_lock.
When I go into del_timer_sync(), but don't find anything
which prevent del_timer_sync() from using in softirq context,
and indeed it's been used in softirq for some timer(such as
__dst_free()).
Thus, tell others it can't be used in softirq context, and
teach lockdep about that. It's realized by patch-0002.
Your comments are very appreciated.
Thanks,
Yong
---
Yong Zhang (3):
timer: fix comments of try_to_del_timer_sync()
timer: del_timer_sync() can be used in softirq context
timer: warn when del_timer_sync() used in hardirq context
kernel/timer.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists