[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1282634338.11025.5.camel@mola>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:18:58 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Mike Rapoport <mike@...pulab.co.il>,
eric miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mfd: tps6586x - free allocated resources when unload
the module
For the resources allocated in tps6586x_i2c_probe(),
we need to free it in tps6586x_i2c_remove().
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
---
Changes since V1:
Current implementation allows gpiochip_add() fail in probe,
thus just show a wraning if gpiochip_remove() fail.
I don't have this hardware handy,
I am not sure that does it make sense to allow gpiochip_add() fail in probe.
drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c b/drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c
index 1c91936..2f9336c 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c
@@ -344,6 +344,19 @@ err_add_devs:
static int __devexit tps6586x_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
{
+ struct tps6586x *tps6586x = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+ struct tps6586x_platform_data *pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (pdata->gpio_base) {
+ ret = gpiochip_remove(&tps6586x->gpio);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_err(&client->dev, "Can't remove gpio chip: %d\n",
+ ret);
+ }
+
+ tps6586x_remove_subdevs(tps6586x);
+ kfree(tps6586x);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists