[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C7317D9.5080002@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:52:41 -1000
From: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KVM timekeeping 05/35] Move TSC reset out of vmcb_init
On 08/20/2010 07:08 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:07:19PM -1000, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>
>> The VMCB is reset whenever we receive a startup IPI, so Linux is setting
>> TSC back to zero happens very late in the boot process and destabilizing
>> the TSC. Instead, just set TSC to zero once at VCPU creation time.
>>
>> Why the separate patch? So git-bisect is your friend.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden<zamsden@...hat.com>
>>
> Shouldn't we set for whatever value the BSP already has, and then the BSP to
> zero? Since vcpus are initialized at different times, this pretty much
> guarantees that the guest will have desynchronized tsc at all cases
> (not that if it was better before...)
>
Yes, we should - but it takes a lot more machinery to do that, and so it
happens later in the series. You have to match the offsets for the BSP
and other vcpus...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists