[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100824092623.GA20334@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:26:23 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@....ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: [PATCH] gpiolib: Add 'struct gpio_chip' forward declaration for
!GPIOLIB case
With CONFIG_GPIOLIB=n, the 'struct gpio_chip' is not declared,
so the following pops up on PowerPC:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
In file included from arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_common.c:19:
include/linux/of_gpio.h:74: warning: 'struct gpio_chip' declared
inside parameter list
include/linux/of_gpio.h:74: warning: its scope is only this definition
or declaration, which is probably not what
you want
include/linux/of_gpio.h:75: warning: 'struct gpio_chip' declared
inside parameter list
make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_common.o] Error 1
This patch fixes the issue by providing the proper forward declaration.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
---
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 04:26:08PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I get that with my current stuff:
>
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> In file included from [..]/mpc52xx_common.c:19:
> of_gpio.h:74: error: ‘struct gpio_chip’ declared inside parameter list
[...]
> make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
That's because with GPIOCHIP=n no one declares struct gpio_chip.
It should be either of_gpio.h or gpio.h. Let's make it gpio.h, as
this feels more generic, and we already have some !GPIOLIB handling
in there.
include/linux/gpio.h | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio.h b/include/linux/gpio.h
index 03f616b..85207d2 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio.h
@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@
struct device;
/*
+ * Some code might rely on the declaration. Still, it is illegal
+ * to dereference it for !GPIOLIB case.
+ */
+struct gpio_chip;
+
+/*
* Some platforms don't support the GPIO programming interface.
*
* In case some driver uses it anyway (it should normally have
--
1.7.0.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists