[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1282613477.22370.485.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:31:17 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paulus@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit ppc rwsem
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:18 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > I've seen drivers in the past do trylocks at interrupt time ... tho
> I
> > agree it sucks.
>
> Recently there was a thread where this was declared absolutely
> illegal.
>
> Maybe it was allowed, or sort-of worked before, and that's why it's
> accounted for with IRQ disables in some implementations. I don't
> know.
Ok, I'm happy to say it's a big no-no then.
Arnd, do you want to take over the moving to asm-generic and take care
of the spinlock case as well ? I can send Linus the first patch that
changes powerpc to use atomic_long now along with a few other things I
have pending, then you can pickup from there. Or do you want me to
continue pushing my patch as-is and we can look at cleaning up the
spinlock case separately ?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists