[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100824170936.GH26154@erda.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:09:36 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with running
perfctrs
On 24.08.10 12:22:52, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Btw, guys, I fail to see how new nmi_watchdog work, we have
> default_do_nmi
> if (!(reason & 0xc0)) {
> if (notify_die(DIE_NMI, "nmi", regs, reason, 2, SIGINT) == == NOTIFY_STOP)
> return
> if (nmi_watchdog_tick(regs, reason))
> return
>
> but perf_event_nmi_handler returns NOTIFY_STOP when watchdog is perf event
> and nmi_watchdog_tick _never_ called, or (most probably) I miss something?
The watchdog is disabled during profiling (perf and oprofile) by
calling disable_lapic_nmi_watchdog().
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists