[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100824195240.GA5281@lenovo>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:52:40 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3] perf, x86: try to handle unknown nmis with running
perfctrs
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:54:58PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
...
> > > | commit 4a31bebe71ab2e4f6ecd6e5f9f2ac9f0ff38ff76
> > > | Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > > | Date: Thu Aug 19 16:28:00 2010 +0200
> > > |
> > > | perf, x86: Fix handle_irq return values
> >
> > Has anyone else seen kernel panics when enabling the LOCKUP_DETECTOR or
> > apply Robert's patch? I keep getting a panic with unable to handle paging
> > request everytime either Robert's patch or the lockup detector uses
> > __get_cpu_var(). And only on 2.6.36 code.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Don
> >
>
> I use 2.6.34 atm. Letme try 2.6.36 (which might require some time to recompile).
>
> -- Cyrill
Don, for me it fails with somehow unrelated page handling fault - in
reiserfs_evict_inode O_o Fails in __get_cpu_var I suspect might means
a problem either in per-cpu allocator itself or we screw pointer somehow.
Weird.
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists