[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100824204009.GS12892@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:40:09 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>
Cc: Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik@....fi>, Chetan Loke <chetanloke@...il.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
scst-devel <scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Linux I/O subsystem performance
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:51:38PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox, on 08/24/2010 06:55 PM wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:43:29PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>>> Also it looks very suspicious why nobody even tried to match that
>>> Microsoft/Intel record, even Intel itself who closely works with Linux
>>> community in the storage area and could do it using the same hardware.
>>
>> You seem to be under the impression that "Intel" is some monolithic
>> entity. Despite working with six different storage& performance
>> groups within Intel, I have no idea what record you're referring to,
>> nor what hardware it was accomplished with.
>
> It is
> http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2010/04/22/1-million-iops-how-about-125-million
Ah, iSCSI. I don't work with that group. I'm a bit too busy with other projects to pursue a relationship with them right now :-)
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists