[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100824213519.GD4979@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:35:19 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Joey Lee <jlee@...ell.com>, trenn@...e.de,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dennis.Jansen@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add intel drm blacklist to intel_opregion_present
detect
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:58:03PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:51:30AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 03:22:19PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Erm. Sorry about that - I just realised that there's actually a fairly
> > > significant problem with it :) Right now you'll perform the register
> > > call unconditionally on module load. You need to make sure that there's
> > > actually Poulsbo hardware in the system, either by registering as a
> > > proper PCI driver and calling acpi_video_register in your probe function
> > > (and unregister in your remove function) or walking the PCI device list
> > > looking for a psb device.
> >
> > Ick, don't walk the pci device list, just register a "real" pci device
> > and do it that way, it's much simpler and plays nicer with the driver
> > model and the rest of the kernel.
>
> My only concern with that (and it's not a strong one) is that it'll
> block the psb driver from binding. Of course, the psb driver should be
> doing the acpi handling itself anyway, so...
If a system really does have this type of driver on it, it can unbind
this driver and then bind itself, from userspace, so I don't see a
problem with this.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists