[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008242350430.2768@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:51:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, apic: Add apic calibration hook.
Alok,
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Alok Kataria wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks for taking a look.
>
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 06:37 -0700, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Alok Kataria wrote:
> > >
> > > +static void __init initialize_lapic_clkevt(long delta)
> > > +{
> > > + /* Calculate the scaled math multiplication factor */
> > > + lapic_clockevent.mult = div_sc(delta, TICK_NSEC * LAPIC_CAL_LOOPS,
> > > + lapic_clockevent.shift);
> > > + lapic_clockevent.max_delta_ns =
> > > + clockevent_delta2ns(0x7FFFFF, &lapic_clockevent);
> > > + lapic_clockevent.min_delta_ns =
> > > + clockevent_delta2ns(0xF, &lapic_clockevent);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int __init calibrate_APIC_clock(void)
> > > {
> > > + apic_calibration_res = x86_init.timers.calibrate_apic();
> > > + if (apic_calibration_res) {
> > > + struct clock_event_device *levt = &__get_cpu_var(lapic_events);
> > > + long delta;
> > > +
> > > + if (lapic_clockevent.mult)
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > Why is this necessary ? calibrate_APIC_clock() is only called once.
> >
>
> Yes, though timer.calibrate_apci() could behave differently on different
> platforms. For eg. the vmware_calibrate_apic doesn't initialize any of
> the lapic_clockevent state and we need this to set it up in that case.
Can we please make this consistent ?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists