linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mt9t031: Fixes field names that changed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:23:20 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To:	Henrique Camargo <henrique@...riquecamargo.com>
cc:	"Aguirre, Sergio" <saaguirre@...com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
	"Karicheri, Muralidharan" <m-karicheri2@...com>,
	"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mt9t031: Fixes field names that changed

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Henrique Camargo wrote:

> If CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV_DEBUG was set, the driver failed to compile 
> because the fields get_register and set_register changed names to 
> g_register and s_register in the struct v4l2_subdev_core_ops.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Henrique Camargo <henrique@...riquecamargo.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/video/mt9t031.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/mt9t031.c b/drivers/media/video/mt9t031.c
> index 716fea6..f3d1995 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/mt9t031.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/mt9t031.c
> @@ -499,8 +499,8 @@ static const struct v4l2_subdev_core_ops mt9t031_core_ops = {
>  	.g_ctrl	= mt9t031_get_control,
>  	.s_ctrl	= mt9t031_set_control,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV_DEBUG
> -	.get_register = mt9t031_get_register,
> -	.set_register = mt9t031_set_register,
> +	.g_register = mt9t031_get_register,
> +	.s_register = mt9t031_set_register,
>  #endif
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.0.4

I might be missing something obvious, but I do not understand against 
which tree / version is this patch? I don't see this problem in the 
mainline.

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/