[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100824222525.349829098@clark.site>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:24:46 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [34/59] net: Fix a memmove bug in dev_gro_receive()
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit e5093aec2e6b60c3df2420057ffab9ed4a6d2792 ]
>Xin Xiaohui wrote:
> I looked into the code dev_gro_receive(), found the code here:
> if the frags[0] is pulled to 0, then the page will be released,
> and memmove() frags left.
> Is that right? I'm not sure if memmove do right or not, but
> frags[0].size is never set after memove at least. what I think
> a simple way is not to do anything if we found frags[0].size == 0.
> The patch is as followed.
...
This version of the patch fixes the bug directly in memmove.
Reported-by: "Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2519,7 +2519,7 @@ pull:
put_page(skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[0].page);
memmove(skb_shinfo(skb)->frags,
skb_shinfo(skb)->frags + 1,
- --skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags);
+ --skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags * sizeof(skb_frag_t));
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists