[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100824222527.286994497@clark.site>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:25:08 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
John Youn <johnyoun@...opsys.com>,
Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [56/59] USB: xhci: Remove buggy assignment in next_trb()
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>
commit a1669b2c64a9c8b031e0ac5cbf2692337a577f7c upstream.
The code to increment the TRB pointer has a slight ambiguity that could
lead to a bug on different compilers. The ANSI C specification does not
specify the precedence of the assignment operator over the postfix
operator. gcc 4.4 produced the correct code (increment the pointer and
assign the value), but a MIPS compiler that one of John's clients used
assigned the old (unincremented) value.
Remove the unnecessary assignment to make all compilers produce the
correct assembly.
Signed-off-by: John Youn <johnyoun@...opsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void next_trb(struct xhci_hcd *xh
*seg = (*seg)->next;
*trb = ((*seg)->trbs);
} else {
- *trb = (*trb)++;
+ (*trb)++;
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists