[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100824224508.354686241@clark.site>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:45:27 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [082/114] can-raw: Fix skb_orphan_try handling
2.6.35-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
commit cff0d6e6edac7672b3f915bb4fb59f279243b7f9 upstream.
Commit fc6055a5ba31e2c14e36e8939f9bf2b6d586a7f5 (net: Introduce
skb_orphan_try()) allows an early orphan of the skb and takes care on
tx timestamping, which needs the sk-reference in the skb on driver level.
So does the can-raw socket, which has not been taken into account here.
The patch below adds a 'prevent_sk_orphan' bit in the skb tx shared info,
which fixes the problem discovered by Matthias Fuchs here:
http://marc.info/?t=128030411900003&r=1&w=2
Even if it's not a primary tx timestamp topic it fits well into some skb
shared tx context. Or should be find a different place for the information to
protect the sk reference until it reaches the driver level?
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
include/linux/skbuff.h | 4 +++-
net/can/raw.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ struct skb_shared_hwtstamps {
* @software: generate software time stamp
* @in_progress: device driver is going to provide
* hardware time stamp
+ * @prevent_sk_orphan: make sk reference available on driver level
* @flags: all shared_tx flags
*
* These flags are attached to packets as part of the
@@ -178,7 +179,8 @@ union skb_shared_tx {
struct {
__u8 hardware:1,
software:1,
- in_progress:1;
+ in_progress:1,
+ prevent_sk_orphan:1;
};
__u8 flags;
};
--- a/net/can/raw.c
+++ b/net/can/raw.c
@@ -655,6 +655,10 @@ static int raw_sendmsg(struct kiocb *ioc
err = sock_tx_timestamp(msg, sk, skb_tx(skb));
if (err < 0)
goto free_skb;
+
+ /* to be able to check the received tx sock reference in raw_rcv() */
+ skb_tx(skb)->prevent_sk_orphan = 1;
+
skb->dev = dev;
skb->sk = sk;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists