lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:44:24 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: [019/114] nilfs2: fix list corruption after ifile creation failure

2.6.35-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>

commit af4e36318edb848fcc0a8d5f75000ca00cdc7595 upstream.

If nilfs_attach_checkpoint() gets a memory allocation failure during
creation of ifile, it will return without removing nilfs_sb_info
struct from ns_supers list.  When a concurrently mounted snapshot is
unmounted or another new snapshot is mounted after that, this causes
kernel oops as below:

> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
> IP: [<f83662ff>] nilfs_find_sbinfo+0x74/0xa4 [nilfs2]
> *pde = 00000000
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
<snip>
> Call Trace:
>  [<f835dc29>] ? nilfs_get_sb+0x165/0x532 [nilfs2]
>  [<c1173c87>] ? ida_get_new_above+0x16d/0x187
>  [<c109a7f8>] ? alloc_vfsmnt+0x7e/0x10a
>  [<c1070790>] ? kstrdup+0x2c/0x40
>  [<c1089041>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x96/0x14e
>  [<c108913d>] ? do_kern_mount+0x32/0xbd
>  [<c109b331>] ? do_mount+0x642/0x6a1
>  [<c101a415>] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x2d1
>  [<c1099c00>] ? copy_mount_options+0x80/0xe2
>  [<c10705d8>] ? strndup_user+0x48/0x67
>  [<c109b3f1>] ? sys_mount+0x61/0x90
>  [<c10027cc>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x22

This fixes the problem.

Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
Tested-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 fs/nilfs2/super.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/nilfs2/super.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
@@ -336,9 +336,10 @@ int nilfs_attach_checkpoint(struct nilfs
 	list_add(&sbi->s_list, &nilfs->ns_supers);
 	up_write(&nilfs->ns_super_sem);
 
+	err = -ENOMEM;
 	sbi->s_ifile = nilfs_ifile_new(sbi, nilfs->ns_inode_size);
 	if (!sbi->s_ifile)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		goto delist;
 
 	down_read(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
 	err = nilfs_cpfile_get_checkpoint(nilfs->ns_cpfile, cno, 0, &raw_cp,
@@ -369,6 +370,7 @@ int nilfs_attach_checkpoint(struct nilfs
 	nilfs_mdt_destroy(sbi->s_ifile);
 	sbi->s_ifile = NULL;
 
+ delist:
 	down_write(&nilfs->ns_super_sem);
 	list_del_init(&sbi->s_list);
 	up_write(&nilfs->ns_super_sem);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ