[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=HwPeWafzTBh66g37XxZouKicsemmnTE-Cvz=Y@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:11:22 -0700
From: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
gthelen@...gle.com, m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cgroup: ID notification call back
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe pass the id number to id_attached() is better.
>
> And actually the @ss argument is not necessary, because the memcg's
> id_attached() handler of course knows it's dealing with the memory
> cgroup subsystem.
>
> So I suspect we can just remove all the @ss from all the callbacks..
Yes, I don't think any subsystem uses these. They dated originally
from when, as part of the initial cgroups framwork, I included a
library that could wrap a mostly-unmodified CKRM resource controller
into a cgroups subsystem, at which point the callback code didn't
necessarily know which subsystem it was being called for. But that's
obsolete now.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists