[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008250326150.16411@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2][BUGFIX] Revert "oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable"
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> oom_adj is not only used for kernel knob, but also used for
> application interface.
> Then, adding new knob is no good reason to deprecate it.
>
> Also, after former patch, oom_score_adj can't be used for setting
> OOM_DISABLE. We need "echo -17 > /proc/<pid>/oom_adj" thing.
>
> This reverts commit 51b1bd2ace1595b72956224deda349efa880b693.
Since I nacked the parent patch of this, I implicitly nack this one as
well since oom_score_adj shouldn't be going anywhere. The way to disable
oom killing for a task via the new interface, /proc/pid/oom_score_adj, is
by OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN as specified in the documentation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists