[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C753D75.2010305@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:57:41 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, jack@...e.cz
CC: jaxboe@...ionio.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@...e.de, tytso@....edu, chris.mason@...cle.com,
swhiteho@...hat.com, konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp,
dm-devel@...hat.com, vst@...b.net, rwheeler@...hat.com,
hare@...e.de, neilb@...e.de, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mst@...hat.com,
jeremy@...p.org, snitzer@...hat.com, k-ueda@...jp.nec.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers
On 08/25/2010 06:00 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:58:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
>>>
>>> ext4 already uses synchronous discards, no need to add I/O barriers.
>>
>> This needs the patch that Jan sent in reply to my initial version merged
>> into it.
>
> Actually the jbd2 patch needs it merged, but the point still stands.
Yeah, wasn't sure about that one. Has anyone tested it? I'll be
happy to merge it but I have no idea whether it's correct or not and
Jan didn't seem to have tested it so... Jan, shall I merge the patch?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists