[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C756BA0.2090700@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:14:40 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH 1/2] x86, mem: separate x86_64 vmalloc_sync_all()
into separate functions
On 08/25/2010 12:45 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com> writes:
>
>> hello,
>>
>> Resend these two patches for bug fixing:
>>
>> The bug is that when memory hotplug-adding happens for a large enough area that a new PGD entry is
>> needed for the direct mapping, the PGDs of other processes would not get updated. This leads to some
>> CPUs oopsing when they have to access the unmapped areas, e.g. onlining CPUs on the new added node.
>
> The patches look good to me. Can we please move forward with this?
>
> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
The patches are mangled so they don't apply even with patch -l --
Haicheng, could you send me another copy, as an attachment if necessary?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists